口腔贴膜表面粗糙度对黏膜黏附性能的影响

许珊珊,雷艳丽,陈晶,,刘晨,,隋宏,,,王文苹,,*

中国药学杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4) : 344-347.

PDF(1637 KB)
PDF(1637 KB)
中国药学杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4) : 344-347. DOI: 10.11669/cpj.2015.04.017
论著

口腔贴膜表面粗糙度对黏膜黏附性能的影响

  • 许珊珊1,雷艳丽1,陈晶1,2,刘晨1,2,隋宏1,3,4,王文苹1,3,4*
作者信息 +

Effect of Surface Roughness on Mucosal Adhesion Properties of Oral Film

  • XU Shan-shan1,LEI Yan-li1,CHEN Jing1,2,LIU Chen1,2,SUI Hong1,3,4,WANG Wen-ping1,3,4*
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨口腔贴膜不同表面粗糙度与黏膜黏附性能之间的关系。方法 以不同粗糙度的砂纸为母版制作聚二甲基硅氧烷反模板,并进一步采用流延法制备口腔贴膜。观察所得贴膜微观形态,并分别测定其体外黏附力、剪切力及黏附时间。结果 壳聚糖贴膜的黏膜黏附性能较优于白及胶贴膜。表面粗糙度不同的贴膜之间体外黏附性能差异显著,其中#400贴膜的性能最优。结论 表面粗糙度对口腔贴膜的体外黏膜黏附性能存在显著影响,值得进一步研究。

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To study the relationship between surface roughness and muc-oadhesion properties of oral film. METHODS Polydimethylsiloxane reverse templates were fabricated from sandpapers with different roughness, and were used as the m-old to prepare films by solvent casting method. The obtained films were then evaluat-ed for mucoadhesive force, shear force, mucoadhesion time, and their morpholog-y was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS Films of c-hitosan showed more favorable mucoadhesive performance than those of Bletilla striata gum. Generally, the prepared films exhibited different mucoadhesion properties, among which #400 films showed the best performance. CONCLUSION The mucoadhesion prop-erties of films were significantly affected by their surface roughness, which are wo-rthy of further study.

关键词

口腔贴膜 / 黏附性能 / 表面粗糙度

Key words

oral film / mucoadhesion properties / surface roughness

引用本文

导出引用
许珊珊,雷艳丽,陈晶,,刘晨,,隋宏,,,王文苹,,*. 口腔贴膜表面粗糙度对黏膜黏附性能的影响[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2015, 50(4): 344-347 https://doi.org/10.11669/cpj.2015.04.017
XU Shan-shan,LEI Yan-li,CHEN Jing,,LIU Chen,,SUI Hong,,,WANG Wen-ping,,*. Effect of Surface Roughness on Mucosal Adhesion Properties of Oral Film[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2015, 50(4): 344-347 https://doi.org/10.11669/cpj.2015.04.017
中图分类号: R944   

参考文献

[1] DIAZ-ARNOLD A M,MAREK C A. The impact of saliva on patient care:Aliterature review.J Prosthet Dent,2002,88(3):337-343.

[2] KUMAR A, BALI V, PATHAK K. Comparative evaluation of porous versus nonporous mucoadhesive films as buccal delivery system of glibenclamide .Am Assoc Pharm Sci, 2013, 9(15):1-12.

[3] NAFEE N A, ISMAIL F A, BORAIE N A, et al. Mucoadhesive buccal patches of micronazole nitrate in-vitro/in-vivo performance and side effect of ageing. Int J Pharm, 2003,264(1): 1-14.

[4] SHINDE G V, SUDHARSHINI S, STEPHENRATHINARAJ B, et al. Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive tablets of niacin using different bioadhesive polymers. Int J Pharm Bio Sci, 2010,2: 1-14.

[5] PATEL V F, LIU F, BROWN M B, et al. Modeling the oral cavity: In vitro and in vivo evaluations of buccal drugdelivery systems. J Controlled Release, 2012, 161(3): 746-756.

[6] LI Y X, ZHU Z J. Evaluation of bioadhesive properties of Bletilla striata gum in vitro.J China Pharm(中国药房),2013,24(27): 2524-2526.

[7] DERJAGUIN B V, ALEINIKOVA I N, TOPOROV Y P. On the role of electrostatic forces in the adhesion of polymer particles to solid surfaces. Prog Surface Sci, 1994,45:119-123.

[8] MAHAJAN P, KAUR A, AGGARWAL G S, et al. Mucoadhesive drug delivery system: A review . Drug Develop Res, 2013, 5(1): 11-20.

[9] BHUSHAN B, HER E K. Fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces with high and low adhesion inspired from rose petal. Langmuir, 2010, 26(11):8207-8217.

基金

国家自然科学基金资助项目(81160521);宁夏自然科学基金资助项目(NZ1226)

PDF(1637 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/